Why have a standard way of building microservices?

Play
The write-up below meant to be a companion to the video above. Please watch the above video to build a better understanding.

Creating microservices is a popular practice among development teams, but a lack of consistent standards can lead to chaos. If each team develops services using individual conventions, it results in a disorganized mix of practices, protocols, frameworks, and guidelines. To mitigate this issue, it’s crucial to establish some level of standardization in microservice development.

In organizations primarily using Python and Go, allowing teams complete autonomy in choosing their programming languages can lead to an unwieldy tech stack. This diversity complicates the recruitment process for engineers with specialized skills. To mitigate this issue, it is crucial to implement a limited, white-listed selection of frameworks and languages to maintain consistency and ease of finding qualified talent.

Centralized logging is vital for effective log analysis, particularly during production outages. Without a standardized logging approach, discrepancies in logging conventions across different services can complicate troubleshooting efforts. Adopting a unified logging methodology ensures streamlined access and enhances the overall efficiency of service management.

A good service is characterized by specific criteria essential for it to qualify as a robust microservice. Key attributes include manageability, which ensures that the service can be efficiently controlled and maintained; observability, allowing users to monitor and gain insights into the service’s performance; and debuggability, facilitating the identification and resolution of issues that may arise.

There are three crucial verticals that require standardization. The first vertical is monitoring, which plays a vital role in understanding the interactions between services. Effective monitoring ensures clear visibility for debugging, enabling efficient problem-solving and system optimization.

The second focus area is the standardization of interfaces. It is essential for services to communicate consistently. This standardization encompasses defining routes, naming conventions for endpoints, methods for pagination, and API versioning.

Tolerance is essential for maintaining the resilience of microservices, ensuring that one service’s failure doesn’t lead to the breakdown of others under heavy load. Key strategies include implementing rate limiting, enabling the ability to disable requests, and effective connection management. These measures help sustain functionality and improve overall system stability.


Arpit's Newsletter read by 100,000 engineers

Weekly essays on real-world system design, distributed systems, or a deep dive into some super-clever algorithm.