How to scope a microservice?



1080 views Designing μ-services



It is always exciting to create new microservices as it gives us so many things to look forward to- a fresh codebase, a new tech stack, or even maybe a clean CICD setup. But does this mean we should create as many microservices as possible?

Whenever we decide to create a new microservice, it is very important to understand its scope of it. If you create a new service for every utility then you are effectively creating a mesh of network calls that is prone to a cascading failure. If your scope is too big, it would lead to the classic problem of a monolithic codebase.

There are a couple of guiding principles that would help us with scoping of microservice.

Loose Coupling

Services are loosely coupled if changes made in one service do not require a change in other. This is the core ideology behind microservices as well, but while designing a system we tend to forget it.

Say, we have an Orders service and a Logistics service. These services are loosely coupled when they do not share anything in common and are communicating with each other via API contracts.

To achieve loose coupling, make your microservices expose as little information as possible. The other service should just know how to consume the data and that is it. No internals, no extra details.

High Cohesion

The principle of High Cohesion says that the related behavior should sit together as part of one service while the unrelated ones should be separate. This would encourage services to be operating independently.

If the Orders service also owns the customer data then when the changes are deployed in one might affect the other module. So the scope of testing before taking things to production increases.

If there is a very strong coupling between the services then it may also happen that the changes in one lead to deploy a few other services- all at the same time. Deploying multiple services at the same time is very risky; because one glitch and the almost entire product is down.

Hence it is not favorable for heterogeneous components to be part of the same service. Keep it crisp and short; and while designing try to keep services loosely coupled and split it to a level where the unrelated components are split up.


Arpit Bhayani

Arpit's Newsletter

CS newsletter for the curious engineers

❤️ by 14000+ readers

If you like what you read subscribe you can always subscribe to my newsletter and get the post delivered straight to your inbox. I write essays on various engineering topics and share it through my weekly newsletter.




Other videos that you might like


Introduction to RPC - Remote Procedure Calls

1531 views 97 likes 2022-05-13

One of the most interesting things that revived itself after a decade is Remote Procedure Calls, fondly called as RPCs; ...

Designing Workflows in Microservices - Orchestration vs Choreography

1659 views 111 likes 2022-05-11

In a microservices architecture there will always arise a need to design workflows; for example: when on an e-commerce w...

Synchronous and Asynchronous Communication between Microservices

1646 views 106 likes 2022-05-04

How should two microservices talk to each other? Picking the right communication pattern is super-important as a good de...

Should some microservices share a database?

1814 views 97 likes 2022-04-27

Microservices need to communicate with each other. Communication between them is always about getting or updating data t...


Arpit's Newsletter read by 14000+ engineers

🔥 Thrice a week, in your inbox, an essay about system design, distributed systems, microservices, programming languages internals, or a deep dive on some super-clever algorithm, or just a few tips on building highly scalable distributed systems.



  • v10.6.4
  • © Arpit Bhayani, 2022